Debate Club!!!

[cmdR_Paige]

Originally Posted by gs29513

Can we debate climate change or something? (I know that sounds snarky, but that's my insecurity that I don't know pop culture at ALL coming out) Like what is a mandalorian anyway?

Oh, it's a Star Wars thing! They're a special race of humans, basically.

[S t a r]

Originally Posted by Christmassy Paige

I personally think that Solo, Rogue One, and the Mandalorian felt more "Star-Warsy" than the new sequels.

But again, just my opinion. Please don't rip me to shreds--

solo and rogue one were good-

but one of the newest ones with the pink-haired lady was just d u m b

[The Room Service Guy]

Why is fortnite SO OVERRATED!!!!ITS TOO OVERATED!!!!!!LIKE MY FREINDS ARE LIKE,you wanna play fortnite?You wanna play fortnite?NO I DO NOT WANT TO PLAY FORTNITE!!!!ALSO HARRY POTTER ALSO GETS TOO MUCH ATTENTION!!!!WARRIORS IS MUCH MUCH BETTER!!!!!WHY IS IT GETTING RIDES AT UNIVERSAL AND SPECIAL SNACKS?!ITS NOT EVEN THAT GOOD OF A FRANCHISE!!!!Ok.Im gonna calm down.These are my opinions.I do not mean to offend anyone.

[gs29513]

OH.

[vampy]

My debate subject is...

Zutara VS Kataang!

*arguments intensify*

[Ikoria the Wolf Pup]

Originally Posted by Jessica1917

Pros/cons of super long series that go on forever and ever like Warrior Cats and Percy Jackson.
Personally, I'm against it.

I personally think that a long, long, series can be good and bad. For one, the number of books you’ve read from it can help determine others how much you like it. It also more easily allows for fan groups to form and talk about it, just like here. If you’re a die-hard fan of a book with only one iteration, well, you know just as much as some person who might have read it because it required low-levels of commitment. Also, the more books you add to the series, the easier it is to explain the history and overall information about the series for harder fans. We don’t need another Destiny. However, it can get much too much. When it gets too long, it’s hard for the authors to come up with new, interesting, original plots. Which means that the series kinda digs itself into a hole where the new books get less and less interesting. Even if they were, having a long string of books makes it easier to get spoilers. Don’t tell me that you haven’t gotten spoilers to warriors books that you haven’t read here on WCO. It’s also really hard to get up to date on the books, and while it is very rewarding to read the whole thing, it’s very hard.

Welp, that’s my say!

[Ikoria the Wolf Pup]

Originally Posted by Cat on motorcycle

Why is fortnite SO OVERRATED!!!!ITS TOO OVERATED!!!!!!LIKE MY FREINDS ARE LIKE,you wanna play fortnite?You wanna play fortnite?NO I DO NOT WANT TO PLAY FORTNITE!!!!ALSO HARRY POTTER ALSO GETS TOO MUCH ATTENTION!!!!WARRIORS IS MUCH MUCH BETTER!!!!!WHY IS IT GETTING RIDES AT UNIVERSAL AND SPECIAL SNACKS?!ITS NOT EVEN THAT GOOD OF A FRANCHISE!!!!Ok.Im gonna calm down.These are my opinions.I do not mean to offend anyone.

I also hate Fortnite.

Harry Potter got it’s fame because people actually made them into movies, which is why Universal made them their rides for the movies and not the books. It’s just that nobody wanted to make the clearly better Warrior Cats into a movie, which was probably because if they were to make it good, the entire thing would be cgi like last year’s Lion King. At the time of Harry Potter, the animals that weren’t real were robots that had a bit of editing. The technology to create Warrior Cats into a movie just didn’t exist back then, although it would definitely be the greatest thing.

[The Room Service Guy]

Originally Posted by Ikoria the Wolf Pup

I also hate Fortnite.

Harry Potter got it’s fame because people actually made them into movies, which is why Universal made them their rides for the movies and not the books. It’s just that nobody wanted to make the clearly better Warrior Cats into a movie, which was probably because if they were to make it good, the entire thing would be cgi like last year’s Lion King. At the time of Harry Potter, the animals that weren’t real were robots that had a bit of editing. The technology to create Warrior Cats into a movie just didn’t exist back then, although it would definitely be the greatest thing.

I guess so.But harry potter was never good to be made into a movie to begin with.

[Jessica1917]

I think Harry Potter's pretty good as a book. Although, yeah, it's way too overrated. Especially the last few books. J.K. Rowling actually made them grow up! *grumpy face*

OK, try and name one movie that is better than it's book counterpart. Go.

(Wait this is probably a bad idea 90% of the movies I know came out in the 1990s um uh oh u guys are gonna start naming ones i never knew existed ;-; )

I'm prepared to be very disappointed in you guys when you start answering the question on whether you guys have actually read The Wizard of Oz. The musical is SOOO LAAAAAME the only plus is there was a doggy :>
I asked my mother why they didn't have the whole rescue from the witch part, and she said because they probably didn't have time. Now, I ask the question, WHY DID THEY ADD THE WHOLE THING WITH THE STUPID LOLLIPOP PEOPLE IF THEY WERE RUNNING LOW ON TIME!?!?!?? >:|

[Ramen Noodles]

Omg the movie Pride, prejudice, and zombies was so much better than the book in my opinion @Jessica1917 the book was so hard to get through